Deep-tech founders, take note of this post. Unsupported claims are easy to understand but hard to believe, while claims without context are easy to believe but hard to understand.
There's 2 (separate) issues ... milestones/checkpoints and calibration/comparison. Engineers have a rough milestone called TRL = technology readiness level which goes from 1 = proof of concept to 9 = systems integration (and market readiness). However, calibrating for a specific industry is non-trivial as it can be a moving target with competitive dynamism. Perhaps a shortcut Is peer comparison against other startups with similar levels of funding.
Deep-tech founders, take note of this post. Unsupported claims are easy to understand but hard to believe, while claims without context are easy to believe but hard to understand.
There's 2 (separate) issues ... milestones/checkpoints and calibration/comparison. Engineers have a rough milestone called TRL = technology readiness level which goes from 1 = proof of concept to 9 = systems integration (and market readiness). However, calibrating for a specific industry is non-trivial as it can be a moving target with competitive dynamism. Perhaps a shortcut Is peer comparison against other startups with similar levels of funding.
Good advice delivered with respect for readers' attention. thank you
good one :)
Airplane Waymo? I am sorry about my failures. I am sorry about failing to keep my emotions in check.